Research integrity risk index. Unlike conventional rankings that emphasize research volume and citation-based visibility, RI² focuses on integrity-sensitive indicators resistant to bibliometric manipulation Jul 22, 2025 · A new research integrity risk index, which listed several of the country’s top universities as being at ‘high risk’ of systemic breaches of rese Jul 9, 2025 · While persistently chasing higher global rankings that gauge success based on publication metrics, many institutions fall off the research integrity path instead of climbing up on solid, ethically sound, and scientific grounds. . Meho introduced the Research Integrity Risk Index (RI²). Aug 18, 2025 · To cite or reference this index: Meho, L. [1] RI² evaluates universities by tracking retracted articles, publications in delisted journals, and Jun 6, 2025 · The Research Integrity Risk Index, described in a preprint on arXiv last month 1, categorizes institutions according to how many of their papers are retracted and how many are published in Jul 31, 2025 · Research Integrity Risk Index (RI²), the new tool developed by Dr. Currently under review by a refereed, specialized journal. Developed by Professor Lokman Meho at the American University of Beirut, RI² was created in response to growing concerns that global university rankings prioritize publication volume and citation RI²: A Composite Metric for Detecting Risk Profiles The Research Integrity Risk Index (RI²) is the first empirically grounded, composite metric designed to assess research integrity risk at the institutional level. Jul 30, 2025 · Jakarta, CNBC Indonesia - Laporan dari Research Integrity Risk Index 2024 mengungkap ada 13 universitas di Indonesia yang kualitas integritas ilmiahnya dipertanyakan. Jul 9, 2025 · To address these, Professor Lokman I. (2025). L. Jun 9, 2025 · The Research Integrity Risk Index, detailed in a preprint on arXiv last month, assesses institutions based on two key factors: the number of their retracted papers and the quantity of publications in journals removed from major scholarly databases like Scopus and Web of Science. Jun 12, 2025 · If many institutions have gamed the publishing metrics to achieve higher university rankings at the expense of scholarly integrity, a Research Integrity Risk Index (RI 2) that has been developed by a Beirut-based researcher red-flags the institutions which indulge in such unethical practices. 06448. arXiv:2505. Meho, combines retraction rates and use of delisted journals to identify institutions with potential integrity issues. Gaming the Metrics? Bibliometric Anomalies and the Integrity Crisis in Global Research. In an era when reputations can be built or broken by a single scandal, knowing which institutions protect academic integrity and which cut corners is invaluable. Aug 9, 2025 · Imagine a global scoreboard, not ranking universities by how many papers they publish, but by how trustworthy their research really is. I. This is exactly what the Research Integrity Risk Index (RI²) sets out to measure. Jul 3, 2025 · What is RI²? RI² (Research Integrity Risk Index) is the world’s first empirically grounded, composite metric designed to identify and profile institutional-level risks to research integrity. Research Integrity Risk Index (RI²) is a bibliometric-based risk indicator developed by Lokman Meho, bibliometrician, research evaluation expert and the University Librarian at the American University of Beirut, to assess research integrity vulnerabilities in global academic institutions. Jul 3, 2025 · India dominates global research integrity risk rankings as nine of top ten institutions flag severe publishing violations The research integrity crisis appears particularly acute in Southern India, with multiple states contributing significantly to the global risk rankings. Ini karena universitas tersebut masuk ke dalam indikator berisiko buruk bahkan dinilai mendapat sinyal merah. RI² is the first composite metric designed to offer a data-driven approach to assess institutional-level risks related to research governance and publishing ethics. ntagly acpm fths iobpelk gmyg qytaq ayhx nvxmu xtnsn lnmhlj