Best docker macos reddit I'm hoping people here can recommend the best way to run Home Assistant. Flatpak is essentially Docker for desktop apps, and Docker on Windows and macOS uses either WSL2 or a VM like VirtualBox to function. On non-linux platforms, like Mac OSX, Docker runs inside a VM so you need to allocate sufficient RAM to the VM in order to support what you will be running in docker. Thanks ! I've recently set up my new MacOS Docker environment from scratch and it's my first time. sh, bash, etc. It is unclear to me why so many MacOS users are fawning about using Docker on it. Docker containers rely on the Linux kernel. Another one is Kasm, I just found out it has macOS support also. But the workflow was suboptimal (scripts to watch changes, rebuild images, restart docker compose, etc) Then I discovered Skaffold. That being said, any Linux will be fine, and X/L/Ubuntu are all great. Even supports auto updates of docker apps. Docker is easy to setup, backup (I have daily and weekly backups running on cron) and restore. While The very best in my opinion is Arch Linux running Docker with all your media physically attached to the server. With a clean install I just use the docker convenience script that they provide. true. I wanted to ask here if you could expand the list, maybe we can get enough together to actually help some new users. I found stuff like Podman, Portainer and Rancher, but not sure if that's a GUI to Docker or entirely a different thing. This folder also gets zipped and backed-up. but I don't like the CLI of MacOS. MacOS Extended (or HFS+ ) is more suitable for HDDs, you can use it on computers running Mac OS 8. 86 votes, 26 comments. Absolutely use UTM for modern macOS on modern macOS. you can search here for posts about it, there's a few that go into details. I’ve read about issues with docker on Mac, but wondering what the consensus is on MacOS. First, it seems that the script downloaded a . You only do it if you have to, like on MacOS. Then I have separate folder for media, where stuff like Plex library goes. It is novel, but I couldn't use UTM every day. Think about this from a different angle. It appears to use quite a bit less RAM. to be fair I set my docker context to use a different device than my M1 macbook. After installing Docker Toolbox, you should be able to run the Redis container as described earlier. The docker-compose. there is a huge proportion of professional developers that are happy with macos (myself included - after having used windows 2. There was a post here recently laying out the proper way to get docker set up which should help if you've already attempted the install. You cant run Docker containers natively on Mac, because Containers are a feature of the Linux kernel and Mac aint linux. 1GB available to Docker containers, usage is actual usage 1. What is the purpose of running Docker? You have a Docker container that runs the same inside Docker no matter if the host is Linux, Windows, Mac, whatever. May 30, 2024 · On macOS, Docker Desktop is the primary supported method since the native OS lacks the Linux kernel features necessary for Docker. Better Snap Tool is the best windows layout manager, putting windows where you want them with simple combo keystrokes. (Pictured). This update introduces OrbStack’s performance data, along with updated insights and comparisons. You CAN, however, run a linux VM on your macbook and point the docker cli to point to the docker API running in that VM. With macos or windows it is not possible of course, because they aren't running on the Linux kernel. Performance is far better with the parallels machines than we ever saw with Virtual Box. I use docker on MacOS it works well and is convenient. Struggled all week with this every second load of a page (even locally – I'm a web developer and couldn't even open links directly on my own computer!!) MacOS 1 and MacOS 2 on the same LAN MacOS 1 : Run Docker Desktop and I have the Postgres Container MacOS 2 : Run Docker Desktop and I have my NodeJs app Container I would like to use docker-compose Best Regards Like, the best-in-class option is the Lenovo Tiny M920/M720 with an 8th Gen i5 (depending on if Intel ME is a bug or a feature for you). I have docker-osx set up using the manual method, it's fairly easy to get going once you wrap your head around how it works but it's not as easily customised as a normal VM and if you don't want it isolated away from the rest of your network managing port forwards is a pain, passthrough more so. His books are pretty verbose and conversation style but then you come out with a solid understanding of the concept and usage. For example: Docker Desktop: A year back I still had containers with CentOS7 and wanted to run them with systemd. Another reason would be to run VMs of mac os. Now the Intel option is gone, and the M2 is out. TLDR Link to heading Two years after my first analysis of Docker performance on MacOS, things have improved significantly. Of course, if you want to interact with the Docker engine then you need to have the Docker daemon running. Any Linux Distro can be made to look like MacOS, but most will require some amount of effort to get to work like MacOS. 1 or higher versions. This Microsoft link explains the process . - sickcodes/Docker-OSX My hope is the work being done on asahi linux will lead to macos-compatible video drivers for KVM at some point. Portainer is a Universal Container Management System for Kubernetes, Docker/Swarm, and Nomad that simplifies container operations, so you can deliver software to more places, faster. for me UTM is the best virtual machine for M1 in general and it runs pretty well. Yes docker can run on MacOS and Windows. Look into UnRAID or Proxmox to get the best of both worlds. Reply reply More replies More replies Docker for Mac is a bit olderbut still same problems as above. If you're going to use docker extensively, Linux is better because there's no VM. Jul 28, 2022 · Here, we'll cover the best OS for Docker, benefits of running Docker on a specific OS and give you tips on selecting the best OS for Docker. But at some version, Docker Desktop changed something, so it didn't worked any longer. It’s best if you prepare a special user for it. QEMU on macOS Hardware Accelerated. I would say Linux Mint is a better option than others and here are the reasons: Hi all, Just a quick one - what is the best NZB client for macOS? I’m currently using SABnzbd, but it seems very resource intensive and I’m not (yet) using a workflow where I’m adding items to it automatically, just ad-hoc NZBs, so happy to have a non-web-based client to just open on the as-and-when. The terminal with the Docker CLI meets those requirements AND is easier to use. There is Docker Desktop to run it on those OSes. The biggest issue is that Docker on MacOS runs in a virtual machine. For example I can't bridge a container to the network on macos compared to Linux and traffic can't be sent directly to a container on macos. I had problems with it crashing and didn't do anything more than enable Kubernetes. On macOS Docker starts a VM and runs containers inside it. We then launch a VM using special configuration flags to use macOS’s virtualisation layer Aug 25, 2023 · The goal is to replace Docker Desktop without changing my current workflow. the best is linux, Java compiles a lot faster than on windows or mac, in my work we have a 6k classes that compiles and deploy to jboss in about 8 seconds, and windows or mac os take 28 and 30 (in the same pc) plus, Docker is native and don´t take extra ram on linux vs wsdl2 and mac virtualbox I have a mac mini as a server and mainly use it for the caching feature. Tried nfs and had issues, also had issues with docker for Mac and several other ways of running docker on mac. This is a quick rundown of how you can have a working dev setup, specifically for web apps, on Windows 10, Mac OSX and Linux. Docker on macOS is not good at bind mounts between host OS and client, so disk IO operations can be a large overhead. Nextcloud is an open source, self-hosted file sync & communication app platform. There is no WSL2, as it is not really required. I have UTM running an instance of Mac OS 9 for PowerPC in a VM for fun. That was a huge advantage. But learned that docker desktop for apple silicon was released in April. Are there any fully open source and free to use Docker Desktop alternatives out there that is available for Linux and does not require a license to… I agree. His question was which laptop is best for working in DevOps. some genius people are making native macos containers possible! ( I mean MacOS native base images not Linux based Images. This video is a macOS Host Tutorial For QEMU On Intel Based Macs. UnRAID had a nice "appstore" with UI for all your docker config needs if you don't want to run docker or docker-compose from the shell. What's the current best way to use docker on macOS? Is it ok to use these days on macOS for web dev development (eg django, postgres, redis, etc)? (I'm used to installing everything via brew. If you then update the docker-compose. The official docs recommend their installer, but normally everything else (eg postgres) is best installed via brew and not a custom installer. It's fine but something to keep in mind. If you can tell more about what you are trying to do in Linux, that would simplify a lot. I run nodejs apps with extensions so important to have a consistent build. If it only exists for x86 and you're running it with an arm-processor (or vice versa) the computer needs to do extra work to emulate. I previously tried to run macOS on my Dell XPS 9360, but the WiFi card wasn't compatible. Haven't used docker yet. A RHEL based like AlmaLinux or Rocky is ok. 32GB in activity monitor, compared to the 1. Don't touch that, you don't know where it's been!. I should say that it isn’t entirely Windows fault for being loud. Yet it is still not perfect, docker in general has a virtual layer to run a Linux core on any mac operating system since macOS is originally BSD based. Docker is built upon the foundations of Linux. I didn't want to replace the card and I saw that it was possible to run macOS in a VM but I'm lazy! So I put this together. Parallels is the way. Currently there is no DockerOS to run Docker. I'd just do that, and then you'll have the exact same CLI on Mac OS that you'd have on Linux. At one time I took a macOS route just for the novelty of it Hi u/geekau - You've mentioned Docker [docker], if you're needing Docker help be sure to generate a docker-compose of all your docker images in a pastebin or gist and link to it. Just about all Docker issues can be solved by understanding the Docker Guide , which is all about the concepts of user, group, ownership, permissions and paths. Unfortunately, no. Frankly, if you're gonna splurge on a 16" Macbook it's likely to be a 5-year device and given your interest in memory bound applications I would totally pay the $200 for double They do allow you to run your own vault server, which is a nice gesture, but this requires an always-on Mac or Linux server with ports 80 and 443 open to the public internet, and it looks to involve managing a cluster of interconnected Docker containers, an activity I prefer just slightly less than pouring $6/gallon gasoline directly into a The very best in my opinion is Arch Linux running Docker with all your media physically attached to the server. I do recommend using Docker because installs on Mac OS can be tricky to implement and get to run properly and sometimes they are not possible at all. In general, if you can avoid bind mounting to the host OS on Mac OS and use regular docker volumes (that don't traverse the VM barrier), do so. I am looking for a good docker solution to run on macOS M1. The license, both for a business and for myself as a solo dev, is completely worth the good parts. One benefit of this is that podman's architecture is daemonless, which means it does not run a long-running program to monitor and interact with the containers. It caches updates for ios and mac os. macOS doesn't support NVIDIA cards anymore so you couldn't do a native passthrough. Flatpak's "test once, run anywhere" promise works thanks to the Flatpak Runtime (essentially a cut-down Linux distro) that it layers on top of whatever distro you're running. Docker gives a controlled environment. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. env and a docker-compose. VMs will also have to be run through translation when they no longer release macos for x86-64 in a couple of years. Portainer has full support for the following Docker versions: Docker 1. Appendix C - why not USB-C but (expensive) Thunderbolt 3?! Seems Windows is better if macOS really can't scan files. VMware Fusion Player is the next best solution and is the free, albeit scaled back, version of VMware Fusion Pro, which also is commercial and expensive. This means software you are free to modify and distribute, such as applications licensed under the GNU General Public License, BSD license, MIT license, Apache license, etc. A subreddit for Jackbox Games, best known for creating use-your-own-phone-as-controller games including The Jackbox Party Pack series! Visit help. I run PiHole in a Docker Container ( image: pihole/pihole:latest), and they pull the stats into Home Assistant. I'm not a mac user s We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. At best you could emulate an AMD card (assuming that's even possible with KVM), but performance would be pretty poor. That's what I'm talkin' 'bout!. Found this recommendation two years later after lots and lots of searching, and after trying e. Having read over 2 dozen Docker books to evaluate and accordingly recommend to my mentees, I can easily say that the best one out there as of now is by the author Nigel Poulton. ==> Formulae docker docker-ls docker-machine-parallels docker-clean docker-machine docker-slim docker-completion docker-machine-completion docker-squash docker-compose docker-machine-driver-hyperkit docker-swarm docker-compose-completion docker-machine-driver-vmware docker2aci docker-credential-helper docker-machine-driver-vultr dockerize I've written a quick guide about running macOS in Docker on Ubuntu Desktop. If you're familiar with cli programs on Linux (i guess you are), you'll feel mostly at home. I know this is a bit stale now - but I just did this today and found it pretty easy. It’s quick to install, pull the LLM models and start prompting in your terminal / command prompt. This is the way. Link. Are there still compatibility problems with the apple M2 chip? I absolutely need to be able to run docker containers flawlessly. One word of caution though, if your only pihole is installed in a Docker Container and you have all of your containers set up with Docker Compose on the same machine you can hit issues when you update Docker as the PiHole which does all your name resolution isn't running. A few things to keep in mind. You develop locally and deploy to a real K8s cluster. I also wanted it to run on any computer that had photos, so it runs on macOS, Windows, and Linux (not just Docker). It takes 2 minutes+ to start Docker for desktop and using it is way slower than on my 2015 MacBook Pro. Bonus: multiple machines simultaneously! I currently have 51 Docker containers running on my Raspberry Pi 4 4GB. But I would suggest to use Linux as OS for your Host as docker is native to Linux and doesn’t need a virtualization layer like on macOS or Windows. Slap in the PCIe riser and a 10/25G NIC and you have 6 cores of reasonably modern CPU with fast enough networking to do remote storage/ceph/whatever. Somehow I always run into problems with docker. yml gets copied here regularly with CRON. 0 to windows 7) Yep. We use it for all of our projects at work, and it allows us to work on any machine with Docker installed. Yeah computation routines might not be slow, but everything is. As an official Fidelity customer care channel, our community is the best way to get help on Reddit with your questions about investing with Fidelity – directly from Fidelity Associates. What is … Ollama Tutorial: Your Guide to running LLMs Locally Read More » Not true, there *is* a difference. I would say - Parallels : the most feature packed and well designed . Because I do run many containers on my local macOS to dev in prod like environment. This tutorial should serve as a good reference for anything you wish to do with Ollama, so bookmark it and let’s get started. u/kaoyte Hi, I've recently did setup in a same way as you but I often loose connection between windows machine and docker container - can't even ping. Automator feature of Mac OS is useful and amazing. What are you running into issues with? I'm running latest proxmox, trying to install latest macOS Monterey. This 👆 I also use MacOS and run SQL Server with Docker and then connect via Azure. The difference is higher complexity. It's like saying satanic death metal is the underlying framework of gospel music because they both use notes. No matter what you run Docker on, the container is the same. I have tried Zabbix and check_no but I end up finding the same issue with both: I can’t find my stuff to monitor. Docker containers are created from docker images. Using Windows + Powershell + Task Scheduler you can write a series of monitors that can restart the service if stopped. Docker on Mac is pretty solid. 82GB before I enabled the feature again docker contexts, the containers don't really run on my macbook The only list i know of is awesom-docker, but it doesn't list the useful ones like the first three down below. A host that can run docker. The slimmer, the better run Fedora ARM or NixOS in UTM, do all my development stuff in there run some performance-critical dependencies in docker mount my home directory into UTM It depends on which computer you want to use the HDD on. I used this guide about 2 months ago and it has been running great since. I've used Ubuntu, Debian, CentOS, and Amazon Linux in productionand the difference is fairly negligible. It's due to how networking is handled on macos. Also it has 2 versions and the standard has a few limitations, but depends on what you need it for, plus it is a paid-yearly thing in order to keep getting the latest version support etc. sadly only windows on arm is supported and Microsoft's intel-to-arm emulation is really bad. I’ve actually done this myself and repurposed my Mac Mini to run Linux 24/7. It does not run Docker, but rather a Docker API-compatible replacement. com for technical support or to report bugs. It is not a requirement to learn cli to use docker. and 1. Hence this in general makes it a little bit slower than what you can achieve when running docker on Linux. 21 votes, 160 comments. Best bet is to just let it use integrated graphics. Noone in their right mind *wants* to run Docker in a VM (edit: on their desktops/workstations). The longer answer is Yes, M1 seems to have great feature sets, Intel Mac, seems less supported. Also, I think I think Dockers are in general useful for me to create a consistent snapshot of my project plus deps. While older versions of Portainer had support for Standalone Docker Yes, this works if you have docker installed on your host machine across the board (Windows, WSL2, Mac, Linux, etc) Apart from the learning curve (i. Since I don’t use docker GUI, I only need to replace the VM layer and keep the docker CLI. The best bet is to format the hard drive and install a Linux distribution. The taskbar works but just feels weird. MacOS in contrast, pulls the user towards a certain preferred way of doing things, and is quieter. Battery last for entire day and more. If you are using bind mounts, use the appropriate cache/consistency options to speed it up quite a bit: A follow up would be to store the docker-compose. I've successfully installed the OS on a passed-through NVMe drive and it's quite responsive - the only thing that is slooow is Docker. Main qBit developers don't even use macOS, so can consider yourself lucky if qBit even works. I've been using Docker on MacOS for many years (about 8 ish) and really REALLY wish I had a Linux headless box to do all the container work in. You can run Podman as a service if you want though, so it will be more or less transparent. Also Debian or Ubuntu LTS (as Debian based distro). My setup is: Last time I bought one I had the choice between a M1 chip or an Intel, and I took Intel because the M1 was known to have problems when running Docker containers. I tried everything and finally settled on arch running docker inside a parallels Vm, with smb mounts to the mac host filesystem. These images can exist for multiple processor architectures. Docker for Mac still uses a VM, it's just much more transparent now. Depending on where you are switching from, M1 is arm64 architecture, and most commonly people are switching from amd64 architecture. I still use my MacBook Pro, but not for anything Docker related (my day job, basically). 3 (NOTE: Use of Standalone Docker Swarm is being discouraged since the introduction of built-in Swarm Mode in Docker. Whereas, APFS file system is used by macOS 10. Say, a ``wsl. This subreddit is temporarily private as part of a joint protest to Reddit's recent API changes, which breaks third-party apps and moderation tools, effectively forcing users to use the official Reddit app. It’s fast, native, and free. I also remote into it to use imessage since I run linux as my primary OS. Because of all the above we only use Docker for CI with some minor exceptions. Installation. This topic probably posted a few times but I haven’t had any success with monitoring tools yet. I haven't noticed any speed issues though that will likely depend some on what the container is running. Then I decided to use docker and docker compose. One would also assume they wish to do other tasks on the machine and based on 15 years of experience working as a software engineer, flat out Linux involves to much tinkering around and messing around to get something close to a useable machine whereas Windows and macOS just work. What you’re seeing when you deploy to a service like Heroku is an entirely different layer of abstraction that takes things even further than containers. Like most developers, I like to keep my workstation clean. exe --user root service docker status && service docker start`` command that could check every minute if the service is down then it'll restart it. similar to windows containers ). It takes some Linux knowledge, but I'd argue it's very much worth the investment, and you can ensure it's tailored to whatever it is you're wanting to do, rather than trying We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Mar 8, 2024 · The most performant Docker setup on macOS (Apple Silicon M1, M2, M3) for x64 / amd64 compatibility. There are so many WebUI Already. Considering that macOS is *nix like system, so most of the things you can do on Linux, you can do on macOS as well. The graphics performance is bad. Hi all, Just a quick one - what is the best NZB client for macOS? I’m currently using SABnzbd, but it seems very resource intensive and I’m not (yet) using a workflow where I’m adding items to it automatically, just ad-hoc NZBs, so happy to have a non-web-based client to just open on the as-and-when. A docker container is a separate user-space, but it still uses the same kernel so it is more resources effective. All good hosts. I switched to minikube plus VMware Fusion when Docker screwed up Docker Desktop licensing and haven't had any issues since. Once its running you can use the docker compose templates from linuxserver. Or maybe they figure out how to pass-through the intel iGPU, as macos does support that. I use NoMachine to connect to it from Windows and that's better than using the console or VNC but if you're trying to do anything graphical you will have a bad time. So AMD, Intel, ARMv8. On PC, I'm using minikube plus VirtualBox. Unfortunately, MacOS docker implementation isn't as good as in Linux. g. Where Mac truly shines is its terminal and Linux-like (BSD) OS. 5, memory usage around 75%, and temperature around 65°C with passive cooling (aluminium case; ambient temperature is typically 20-25°C). Install Colima with Homebrew: See full list on alexos. The default VM uses 2GB of memory. AND NEVER START A SENTENCE WITH And is a very useful word and it has many uses in grammar and it is spelled A-N-D and it can transform into anything starting with the "and" by attaching itself to the beginning of the word and an example would be "android" because android is and and droid combined Hey guys. While the M3 Pro offers more power, the significant price difference may not justify the upgrade if RAM is your primary concern. Run macOS VM in a Docker! Run near native OSX-KVM in Docker! X11 Forwarding! CI/CD for OS X Security Research! Docker mac Containers. Might be that, ence the "extra caracter after the end of d command", in Linux perhaps we have a I know you guys are very good with command line. 13 (High Sierra) or later. I’ve even thought about spinning up a Linux VM and running docker there since the machine is powerful enough. I have difficulty focusing, so MacOS’s design philosophy helps me a lot, although sometimes a dev’s desire to be minimalist can be a frustration. I come from Windows and running Radarr/Sonarr as services, so obviously I read every guide I could and it took me a while to get everything going. As of today, docker support on Apple Silicon macs has gotten much better. The best os to use generally is the one you're most comfortable maintaining, or the one that best supports the specific versions / features you want to use. Go with native MacOS app? Or a docker container? I’ve read docker on Mac is a PITA. That has absolutely nothing to do with the original post or your question. I prefer Arch as I can keep it super lean. I haven’t tried it but looks very very polished. iTerm2 without it really having what I needed as a lifelong MobaXTerm user, and RoyalTSX honestly is exactly what I was looking for, plus I'm starting to like it's organization system (with "Documents" representing unified terminals/stored credentials/remote desktops/scp connections as needed Posted by u/deten - 2 votes and 4 comments macOS (10. Note that Docker Toolbox uses docker-machine to manage virtual machines, so you may need to start a Docker machine first by running docker-machine start default and set up your environment with eval "$(docker-machine env default)". CPU load typically sits between 1-1. IMO no. It's sluggish as hell. knowing Docker), the main downside is the size of the docker images for every project as opposed to size of the virtual environment. For example if I run Debian, in my Docker container I can specify CentOS user space and that is what will be present in my container + my own systems native kernel. For Windows to run Docker, Docker provides Desktop application which essentially a virtual machine running Docker runtime inside Hyper-V. Docker. And by a lot. Since APFS can “duplicate” a file without copying its bytes on the SSD, if you want a throwaway copy of a VM you can simply discard when you’re done with it, duplicate it in the finder (an instantaneous process even if it’s many hundreds of GB) and open that. This is what I did: Install Docker Desktop (click the blue Docker Desktop for Windows button on the page and run the exe). Just amazing this is still ongoing 2 years later, but I can't thank you enough. e. ). Libraries are portable between computers (paths to assets in your library database use volume UUIDs , rather than simple paths whose mount points can change arbitrarily due to GIO/macOS/Windows giving it a different mountpoint or Manjaro is a GNU/Linux distribution based on Arch. So, the VERY start point is going to be slow. What I really need is a separate Linux server but for now all my stuff runs on my Mac or VMs on the Mac. . Docker Desktop on macOS is kind of crappy. You can compare them side by side here and choose the one that suits your needs. We should be able to done through terminal UI . therefore professional applications i need, like solidworks don't run :( We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. But you cant run them natively. Don't think there are many differences between running Docker on M1 vs M2, but one important detail. Including any shell you are more familiar with (e. Coming from a Mac I really like my dock. I have a visual walkthrough that will help. Especially if you come from a Linux based dev background, you will feel home. VirtioFS is now much faster (bind mounts are only 3x slower instead of 5-6x), and If you need a GUI, install portainer. Make sure you have the latest Docker Desktop for MacOS. Not sure what you mean by not saving state. Company's development team is all MacOS running Parallels and Vagrant to manage them. But when I change type of network from shared to another one (let's say host-only, doesn't matter) and switch back - I am able to ping Mac but shortly after connection is lost again. Docker for Linux uses the native host’s kernel, and then changes out the user space level OS. If you choose to bypass Docker Desktop—for instance, by using Colima or similar alternatives—the official documentation implies that you need to manually install the additional tools (like docker-compose and Mar 8, 2024 · The most performant Docker setup on macOS (Apple Silicon M1, M2, M3) for x64 / amd64 compatibility. OP asked for an open source alternative to Docker Desktop. Apple wants developers to pay and if something is free and open source, then it's silly to identify and waste extra time and money for something not giving any profit. 17 or greater Ensure you have Docker Settings -> General -> Choose File Sharing Implementation set to VirtioFS - the default is gRPC FUSE and although that's faster than oxfs legacy, VirtioFS is still faster in my tests. Posted by u/Historical-Jello-501 - 3 votes and no comments somehow trimming down macOS as far as possible, basically just a minimal "hardware abstraction layer" that runs UTM and docker. UTM is limited and is best used for emulation IMO. So IIRC Windows , Linux and OSX do not agree on the EOL way. The short answer is Yes*. Make sure your docker-compose version is 2. A rolling release distro featuring a user-friendly installer, tested updates and a community of friendly users for support. I recently installed XCP-NG on the EliteDesk just to learn it and created a few VM's, but now I'm reading a bunch about Docker and it seems a bunch of people prefer to run HA on Docker. You can also virtualize macOS if you own a Mac (technically you don’t need a Mac one but it’s harder and violates the license). Some people just don't like cli and prefer gui. It sounds like you just want to use macos like you are used to do with linux and windows. Find it here. The terminal has almost everything I need, built-in, including python. , and software that isn’t designed to restrict you in any way. 15. ” Apr 30, 2025 · Ollama is a tool used to run the open-weights large language models locally. The computer is a Core i5 2011 Mac Mini with two hard drives and 8GB of RAM. I'm hitting a similar amount of RAM on macOS with the workload you mentioned, the benefit I'd see of using WSL2 instead is that it should have better performance since the WSL2 VM is better ОS: Linux, Mac OS X, Windows. No idea if it's the best practice, but it work sufficiently well for me and has been for a few years. Easily ssh into remote machines, run automation scripts, full Linux-like experience. You get NAS functionality (file server) with built in docker and VM support. Docker separates docker from the data, so when they update docker, the data stays in a different vm and is not affected by the upgrade of the docker vm. I do most deployments and management over command line, but still like GUI to see what is happening. No idea how slow is in Windows. 2. Under macOS MST can be used to: Connect a single titled display Connect multiple displays in mirroring mode As of now only Windows & Linux fully support MST. jackboxgames. So the quick answer to your question is that Docker requires almost no additional memory on Linux while it requires whatever you give the VM on Mac, 2GB by default. I run Docker Desktop on my Mac all day long and I have my Docker VM set to 4CPU and 6GB of memory. yml Then it's trying to use SED to replace things in them. For these consider simply using docker volumes. In fact, in many many many scenarios, the commands are so long that you waste a considerable amount of time compared to clicking 3 buttons in a gui. I read that Docker Desktop is not the best. Wow. 6) does not fully support MST This is a problem known for years and reported by many. f you're a heavy Docker user, investing in the M2 MacBook Air with 16GB of RAM is a solid choice, especially considering your current laptop's struggles with Docker. This was on relatively new hardware, mind you. Docker is used for running prebuilt images. A community for sharing and promoting free/libre and open-source software (freedomware) on the Android platform. It’s actually the best experience I’ve had so far with Docker during development, and unless something drastically changes on macOS I won’t be going back. Our goal is to help Redditors get answers to questions about Fidelity products and services, money movement, transfers, trading and more. I want to have a HA dashboard, MQTT and Node Red, plus more I'm sure. To run docker on macos, you still need to run the docker system on top of the Linux kernel. Of modification of the base image Because I do run many containers on my local macOS to dev in prod like environment. If you have the time to learn it, Docker might be a good approach. Also, add to that the ridiculous amount of RAM that Docker VM requires by itself. You’d have to make significant modifications to Docker for it to work on MacOS. io to set up Plex, *arrs, etc. So whether you're getting started with Docker or looking to jumpstart your career with a credible Docker course , this article will help. I could run multiple services in docker and share the setup in git. I've used the Hypervisor Framework (HVF) which Is Inbuilt Into macOS For Hardware Acceleration giving a performance boost. So, as the VM layer, I use Colima - container runtimes on macOS. It also caches icloud data so that stuff loads much faster at home. As for what Linux Distro. yml in a git repository with all the files that you want to mount in the docker container(s). yml by specifying a different tag for an Docker image, then it still works (Unless the configuration for the application has changed). That’s one of the advantages of Docker. Also Windows has native windows containers and could run inside the same docker desktop or inside Windows Nano Core. Docker for Mac is a native MacOS X application that embeds a hypervisor (based on xhyve), a Linux distribution and filesystem and network sharing that is much more Mac native. We're not cool so no Docker. There is no docker0 bridge on macOS Because of the way networking is implemented in Docker Desktop for Mac, you cannot see a docker0 interface on the host. What software would allow me to have a dock like MacOS without taking up much resources and boot before the taskbar each time during startup. It's possible to install pretty much any CLI tool available on Linux, on Mac OS. Access & sync your files, contacts, calendars and communicate & collaborate across your devices. What Docker OS would you guys recommend? Specifically I’d like to be able to remotely manage the dockers from a web interface, see when updates are available, and be able to set unique host names IP addresses for each Docker. The VS Code extension it mentions is also pretty good. To Interact with LLM , Opening a browser , clicking into text box , choosing stuff etc is very much work. dev Jan 4, 2025 · Info 06/01/2025 Update: Many readers requested the inclusion of OrbStack in the benchmarks. 10 to the latest version Standalone Docker Swarm >= 1. Just download and install it. Edit: found it. xztrj cbsuarxf pygm azjletg lugri pkuug lyqmiw esxrso dxmeq edoqnsl